The Sky Isn’t Falling: My Two Cents on the State of StarCraft 2

So, in light of all the buzz that’s been going around since Destiny’s vitriolic rant against StarCraft 2 and Blizzard, and having seen so many videos of players and casters discussing the issue, I feel the urge to also give my take on the current situation.

I’d like to draw a comparison between Blizzard and a somewhat well-known company known as Apple. This is not a point-by-point comparison, and I’m not suggesting that they are similar in most aspects or even how they function. But right now, it seems to me that, ultimately, Blizzard is so confident in their game that, like Apple, they are comfortable with implementing changes to their products at a glacial pace and still retain its consumers.

In a similar light, Apple has been hounded by fans, industry insiders alike for upgrading the iPhone at such a slow pace that it has been caught up by companies like Samsung. Components such as the front-pacing camera were not installed until the 4, by then many other phones already have the same features. In the end though, it seemed like only Apple knew best, as the iPhone 4 sales was through the roof. However, the post-Jobs Apple is showing signs of slowing down even more, as the iPhone 5, despite a complete new design, just doesn’t seem to be a giant leap from the 4S.

Meanwhile, Blizzard has also been blasted for being so slow, showing reluctance even, to implement simple changes that can improve user experiences. Features such as better chat channels, a more integrated arcade, ladder, leveling system have thus far been missing in Wings of Liberty. As such, without digressing too much, it is great to know that most of them will be included in Heart of the Swarm.

As most gamers are aware, League of Legends has overtaken SC2 as the most viewed and played ESports game. As has been discussed on the latest (57) episode of Inside the Game, SC2 can very much be viewed as the game that paved the way for such a vast online competitive gaming community, having started over two years ago, when LoL and Dota2 were in their infancy. Was SC2 overtaken by LoL because of its failures and slowness in implementing changes? I don’t think that’s the case. Here’s why.

First of all, they are two completely different games. League of Legends is purely team-based, and as such, naturally calls for communications between teammates during gameplay, which fosters a fast-growing community. StarCraft 2 is predominantly a one-versus-one game. Unless there’s something in particular you want to say, there’s not much of a point in chatting with your opponent. That’s just how the game works. Nothing can be done about it.

Secondly, and this is why I think for the most part why Blizzard is so slow in making changes, is that, well, they think StarCraft 2 is hands down the better game, that fans of the game won’t stop playing it, that new gamers will try it because of the fact that it’s a good game, and that there’s not even a chance that League of Legends will wipe SC2 off the map. Note that I don’t mean SC2 will mount a comeback and gain more viewers than LoL any time soon, but to suggest that SC2 will be dead in 2 years is plain ridiculous.

Similar to Apple, Blizzard are confident in their products, and thus are taking their time with their upgrades. Apple knew that the iPhone (and iPad, i-everything, really) are still hugely popular, so why make drastic changes when the current formula is working? Having said that, I think Blizzard has finally pushed its fans to the edge, and ought to finally make a sweeping series of changes to improve the experiences.

Lets go back to the nature of SC2 as a game. A lot of gamers, Destiny included, claim that casual gamers see no incentive in hopping onto ladder and play competitively to gain points; that the anxiety of playing against people who can cheese / 4 gate / bad manner you / crushing you, is enough to deter them from ever playing on ladder. I agree with that sentiment, to a certain extent. But to say that the game itself is difficult to get into because of the ladder system takes away from the nature of the game itself. StarCraft is an immensely complicated real-time strategy game that requires a combination of solid mechanics and strategy (which includes taking calculated risks, educated guesses, out-thinking opponents), both of which can be achieved through practice. The key to StarCraft being a great game is the enormous sense of reward when a player knows that all the playing and practicing has paid off and he starts winning games and climbing up the ladder.

There is an element missing when people talk about the state of SC2 and why it’s hard to get into, that is that not enough people are discussing the mechanics of the game, instead focusing on strategy on talk shows and interviews. While that might interest those who are already into the game, newcomers might be befuddled by all the strategy talk without knowing what they mean. That’s why Day9 has such an important role in SC2 because of his tutorial videos on both mechanics and strategy. The mechanics of LoL and Dota are easier, at the very least in the sense that you only control one unit. The mechanics of macro is much more of an elusive concept to grasp. But once a player starts getting the mechanics down and can competently macro and micro, the sense of fulfillment is incredible. It’s what keeps me playing.

And now, with the debut of the revamped User Interface in the latest Heart of the Swarm beta patch, StarCraft is more appealing than ever. So fear not, frustrated Crafters! StarCraft is fine. Let Blizard know your concerns, and keep playing!

Starcraft Diary #9 – Up the Ladder / Understanding Gold & Platinum Game Sense

Hello readers! I know that I haven’t posted in this blog for quite a while. And it’s not that I haven’t been playing SC2, I’ve been doing a lot of that, it’s just that sometimes I find it difficult to place into writing what I think of the game, strategies, meta game, etc, that I was a bit scared that I won’t be churning out anything worth reading. But now that enough time has passed, and I’ve made quite a bit of progress in the game, I’m back!

I noticed that when I first had the intentions of writing my StarCraft experiences here, that I was a bronze 1v1 player. Well, after some 3 months of playing (I didn’t have a gaming computer for over a month), I currently sit at #2 of my Gold league. While I would be happy if I could reach Platinum in the near future, I am quite aware of the fact that I am slowly but surely improving.

My mechanics and reaction time have improved. But most importantly, my game sense has gotten better.

A recent experience that echos this sentiment has to do with not giving up after losing a big engagement. As I currently am playing mostly Gold and Platinum players, their game senses, while certainly better than those from Bronze and Silver, are surely not at the pro level.

There have been many cases where I lost in a big fight against my opponent, or my all-in strategy didn’t work, and had my opponent pushed out right then he would’ve won, but didn’t, allowing me to macro back up and tech switch to take back the game.

It is quite discouraging to lose almost your entire army after an engagement, and sometimes players are tempted to leave the game right then. But the fact is, your opponent will not always have the intuition to keep pushing and win the game. Sometimes they would fall back to their base, giving you an opportunity to macro up and / or harass.

So, remember, when you lose your army, don’t give up right away! See what your opponent does first. If he massed roaches and falls back after beating your army and keeps on massing roaches, what’s to stop you from massing voidrays and kill him? All you need is that window of few minutes, and in the Gold league, those windows are often wide open.

Starcraft Diary #7 – Getting Sick of Losing… Time to Cheese

Are you sick of losing to Starcraft 2? Have you been trying all kinds of different builds, improve on your macro, and trying to get the appropriate army composition to for the mid to late game, only to lose game after game? I have a suggestion.

It’s time to cheese.

Without getting to ‘meta’ or abstract, what is cheese anyway? It’s a subjective concept. As long as you win games with it, it’s a good strategy. The only reason why cheese is labeled so is because the ‘cheeser’ will be economically behind his opponent if his attack fails.

But, at the same time, honestly, many players in Bronze, Silver, and Gold leagues aren’t very good at defending ‘cheese’ strategies such as 6 pool, 4-Gate, Cannon-rush, or Proxy Rax, so why not use them to win games?

Plus, after seeing GEGTGaulzi cannon rush in Day9 Daily #455, the cannon rush can be viewed as a perfectly legitimate pro strategy. In the daily, Day9 mentions that while most cannon rush videos submissions were fails, a pro like gaulzi is proof that high-level cannon rushes are done with amazing micro skills.

My point is to be good at cannon rush you actually need a high skill level. The same could be said of the 4 gate. For lower to mid level players, it’s actually quite hard to have a 4 gate ready and reach your opponent’s base in under 6 and a half minutes, let alone 6. And if you do, you are guaranteed to win more than lose.

So, if you are sick of losing with macro and micro in the mid-late game, cheese away! As per my hatred for the Zerg race, specifically the mutalisk, I plan to cheese every game against Zerg in the near future.

In the meantime, glhf!

Starcraft Diary #5 – The 7 1/2 Minute DT Rush in Bronze / Silver

I know, I know. I know that Day9 says that the fastest possible Dark Templar, if one were to rush straight to it, should be around 7 minutes. But for those of us in Bronze and Silver leagues who do not possess a 100+ effective APM, remember this: you opponents’ skills aren’t that much better than yours, therefore a DT that arrives at 7:30 might do just as much damage as a 7 minute DT at a Diamond league or above.

I know because I just won three games with it.

Again, I won’t go into the technicalities of making DTs. The important thing, though, is figuring out which building(s) you should go for first when your DTs run into your opponent’s base.

As I use this strategy primarily against Zerg (because: 1. Terran often walls in their ramp and can scan to take out the DTs while they are hacking away at the supply depots, and; 2. Lower league Protoss players very often likes to make photon cannons, which often keeps them from losing and they don’t even know it.), if you see that a Lair’s already finished, there’s no point in taking it out because an overseer is coming even if you kill it. I actually made the error of going for the lair first and almost lost that game.

Instead, I would suggest going for either the roach warren or the spawning pool, here’s why: If your zerg opponent is being DT rushed, even if they get an overseer, they might elect to just go for a base trade. Regardless of whether or not you are able to defend the army headed to your base, you can make the most of your DTs by taking out the structure that allows your opponent to reinforce his army, in this case the roach warren and the spawning pool.

Finally, even if the DT rush fails, because this is lower league play, your opponent is more often than not intimidated by your aggression and will be less aggressive. One thing to note, though, is of course: if you see cheese, you might want to cheese back. Don’t be surprised if your zerg opponent tries a nydus network, or rush to mutas, after your DT rush.

In the mean time, glhf!

Starcraft 2 Diary #1 – Intro + Life of a SC2 addict

So, after having played Starcraft 2, my favorite game, for over a year, and having watched way too much videos of Day9, Husky, and others, I’ve decided to start writing about my experiences from playing the game.

Note that it is not my intention to provide any education material through these posts, even if sometimes sometimes hopefully some tips and things I see can be helpful for other gamers.

In the current season, I have been hanging around the #1 spot in… Bronze ladder. I have taken down silver leaders often but I’m not sure why I haven’t advanced. I’d like to think that my skills are better than most beginner players, but the greatest hindrance to improving my game is probably the lag of my computer, which literally has 1 or 2 second delays (or more) from my actions when there are more units produced.

It is, however, skill fun to play, despite the lag that I have to go through. Although the lag severely hinders my ability to use two major units to their full potential (sentry and high templar), I still manage to perform well with what I have. So… without further due, I’m going to talk about my latest experiences in the next post.